Roger L. Burry v. Eustis Plumbing & Heating, Inc., a Nebraska Corporation Alcan Aluminum Corporation, Doing Business as Kroy Transportation, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a new trial is necessary only when the instructions “misled the jury or had a probable effect on its verdict” (citation omitted)
• holding that the plaintiff’s “showing of prejudice [for an alleged erroneous jury instruction] fizzles” in part because “the defense exposed serious problems with his case”
• affirming a district court's denial of a motion for a new trial where delivery of jury instruction did not prejudice movant
• \We will order a new trial only if the error misled the jury or had a probable effect on its verdict.\ (internal marks omitted)
• “We will order a new trial only if the error misled the jury or had a probable effect on its verdict.” (internal marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).