Skip to main content
· 2/11/2003

Roger J. Bergfeld, Sr. Denise I. Bergfeld v. Unimin Corporation, Martin Marietta Corporation, Also Known as Lockheed Martin Corporation

Citations

  • 319 F.3d 350
  • 60 Fed. R. Serv. 736
  • 55 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 33
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2380
  • 2003 WL 272183

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a failure to disclose a witness was not in bad faith where the other party “had adequate notice during discovery that [the witness] was a person likely to have discoverable information”
  • \Bergfeld concedes that Deere possessed the kind of generalized industry knowledge described in Goodbar and Smith. \
  • “Bergfeld concedes that Deere possessed the kind of generalized industry knowledge described in Goodbar and Smith.”
  • “Although [affiant’s] name was not included in Lockheed Martin’s disclosures, Bergfeld had adequate notice during discovery that [affiant] was a person likely to have discoverable information.”
  • “Section 388 is a rule of negligence, not one of strict liability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Lay, Magill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.