· 2/11/2003
Roger J. Bergfeld, Sr. Denise I. Bergfeld v. Unimin Corporation, Martin Marietta Corporation, Also Known as Lockheed Martin Corporation
Citations
- 319 F.3d 350
- 60 Fed. R. Serv. 736
- 55 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 33
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2380
- 2003 WL 272183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a failure to disclose a witness was not in bad faith where the other party “had adequate notice during discovery that [the witness] was a person likely to have discoverable information”
- \Bergfeld concedes that Deere possessed the kind of generalized industry knowledge described in Goodbar and Smith. \
- “Bergfeld concedes that Deere possessed the kind of generalized industry knowledge described in Goodbar and Smith.”
- “Although [affiant’s] name was not included in Lockheed Martin’s disclosures, Bergfeld had adequate notice during discovery that [affiant] was a person likely to have discoverable information.”
- “Section 388 is a rule of negligence, not one of strict liability.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Lay, Magill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.