Skip to main content
· 12/19/2002

Roger G. Galbraith v. United States

Citations

  • 313 F.3d 1001
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 26197
  • 2002 WL 31835532

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming district court’s decision to forego an evidentiary hearing where petitioner did not provide “specific details”
  • affirming district court's decision to forego an evidentiary hearing where petitioner did not provide “specific details”
  • noting “[the defendant] himself [could] have submitted a sworn affidavit recounting the facts … and surrounding events” in support of his claim for ineffective assistance of counsel
  • noting “[the defendant] himself [could] have submitted a sworn affidavit recounting the facts … and surrounding events” in support of his claim for ineffective assistance of counsel
  • basing § 2255 petition claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on petitioner’s sworn affidavits
  • the ineffective assistance analysis takes place in the context of a presumption that an attorney’s conduct is reasonably proficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Easterbrook, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.