Roger FUTRELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.I. CASE, a Tenneco Company, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statements like \sharp young people\ and that the employee was not a \forward enough thinker\ could reasonably be interpreted as evidence of bias under the ADEA
• rejecting view that discriminatory remarks are not probative unless made “within the context of the employment decision in question”
• when district court grants judgment as a matter of law, we view evidence and reasona- ble inferences in light most favorable to “party winning the verdict”
• when district court grants judgment as a matter of law, we view evidence and reasona- ble inferences in light most favorable to “party winning the verdict”
• when district court grants judgment as a matter of law, we view evidence and reasona- ble inferences in light most favorable to “party winning the verdict”
• when district court grants judgment as a matter of law, we view evidence and reasona- ble inferences in light most favorable to “party winning the verdict”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).