Roger Forrest v. Kraft Foods, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff was not similarly situated when the plaintiff had a history of similar violations and this was the other employee’s first such violation
• plaintiff not similarly situated when plaintiffs disciplinary record was more serious than the compared employees
• plaintiff not similarly situated when plaintiff's disciplinary record was more serious than the compared employees
• “[A] nonmoving party may not rest upon mere denials or allegations, but must instead set forth specific facts sufficient to raise a genuine issue for trial.”
• evidence of disparate treatment can support assertion of pretext, but comparable employee must have been similarly situated to plaintiff in all relevant respects; comparator was not similarly situated where plaintiff did not show “comparable disciplinary history”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).