Rogan v. Giant Eagle, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the court could consider, inter alia, EEOC documents and a right to sue letter “either as undisputed documents referenced in the complaint or central to the plaintiff’s claim, or as information which is a matter of public record”
• “The remaining submissions are neither referenced in the complaint nor essential to the plaintiff’s claims, and we will not consider them here.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).