Rogan v. Essex County News Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing identical language in Laws 1976, chapter 57 as “specifically relating] to insurers who issue certificates of insurance” and evincing “no intention ... to directly regulate employee welfare plans as insurers”
• “in the event [that] they are [insurers] we would have no difficulty finding explicit pre emption by ERISA notwithstanding the saving clause.”
• alternative holding, relying on Todd, supra, for the proposition that the states’ regulation of the insurance business is not restricted by the commerce clause
• state may not directly regulate employee benefit plan under general insurance law despite McCarran-Ferguson
• state may not directly regulate employee benefit plan under general insurance law despite McCarran-Ferguson

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).