Skip to main content
· 6/19/1997

Roffman v. Butler (In Re ROPT Ltd. Partnership)

Citations

  • 209 B.R. 144
  • 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 876
  • 1997 WL 339883

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding it impermissible that Debtor’s counsel could not have represented a third party’s interest who was adverse to the estate
  • vacating bankruptcy court’s order that third party return cash to estate outside context of adversarial proceeding noting such action violated Rule 7001 and due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Votolato, Goodman, Haines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.