Roess v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting majority rule; “There is nothing in the Florida cases to indicate that one element is the ‘essence’ of the tort, or might be otherwise regarded as more important than another element.”
• lawsuit pending when insured applied for coverage against malicious prosecution liability
• lawsuit pending when insured applied for coverage against malicious prosecution liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).