Skip to main content
· 1/20/1975

Roemer v. Zurich Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 323 N.E.2d 582
  • 25 Ill. App. 3d 606
  • 1975 Ill. App. LEXIS 3625

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a former employer’s statements to a placement agency “must necessarily be classified as conditionally privileged”
  • former employer’s response to request for information about plaintiff’s job performance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goldberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.