Roemer v. Bernheim
Citations
- 132 U.S. 103
Syllabus
<p>The granting or refusal, absolute or conditional, of a rehearing in equity, rests in the discretion of the court, and is not a subject of appeal:</p> <p>After a suit in equity for the infringement of a patent has been heard and decided in favor of the defendant on the merits, the plaintiff cannot put in evidence a disclaimer, except at a rehearing granted by the court, upon such terms as it sees fit to impose.</p> <p>Letters patent No. 208,541, granted to William Eoemer, September 1, 1878, for improvements in locks for satchels, are void for want of novelty.'</p>
Judges: Gray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court· 1937-02-01· cited 223×
- Pfister v. Northern Illinois Finance Corp.Supreme Court· 1942-11-16· cited 158×
- First Trust & Savings Bank v. Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Co.Eighth Circuit· 1938-08-08· cited 25×
- Roemer v. NeumannSupreme Court· 1889-11-11· cited 19×
- Trane Co. v. Nash Engineering Co.First Circuit· 1928-03-26· cited 19×
- Lamson Co. v. WhittemoreSeventh Circuit· 1931-06-30· cited 15×
- Producers' & Refiners' Corp. v. LehmannEighth Circuit· 1927-02-25· cited 15×
- Willis v. DavisSixth Circuit· 1911-02-07· cited 10×
- Good Roads Co. v. Charles Hvass & Co.Second Circuit· 1934-04-30· cited 6×
- Mintz v. LesterTenth Circuit· 1938-03-16· cited 6×
- Denney v. Fort Recovery Banking Co.Seventh Circuit· 1943-04-19· cited 6×
- De Jordan v. HudspethTenth Circuit· 1943-08-27· cited 5×
- Bondholders & Purchasers of the Iron Railroad v. Toledo, D. & B. R.Seventh Circuit· 1894-01-20· cited 5×
- Hazeltine Corp. v. WildermuthSecond Circuit· 1929-11-04· cited 4×
- Steinfur Patents Corp. v. MeyersonSecond Circuit· 1931-05-14· cited 2×
- Iglesias v. Banco Territorial y Agricola de Puerto RicoFirst Circuit· 1920-11-19· cited 2×
- Sample v. American Soda Fountain Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania· 1905-01-14· cited 1×
- A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1966-07-07
- Minkap of California, Inc. v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1967-11-09
- Smith v. SimpsonEighth Circuit· 1905-10-17
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.