Roemelmeyer v. Vidana (In Re Vidana)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that funds ostensibly in the possession of a daughter actually belonged to the father because the daughter was “merely [the father’s] alter ego or a straw man” used to hide funds
• concluding that funds ostensibly in the possession of a daughter actually belonged to the father because the daughter was “merely [the father’s] alter ego or a straw man” used to hide funds
• “The failure of a party to provide evidence peculiarly available to that party supports the inference that the truth would be damaging to the party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).