Roehner v. ATLANTIC COAST DEV. CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dismissal is appropriate where it is “inescapably clear from the face of the complaint that the suit was filed beyond the statutory period”
• reversing with instructions to dismiss complaint with prejudice because it was “inescapably clear from the face of the complaint that the suit was filed beyond the statutory period” in § 95.11(5)(b) (citation omitted)
• “This is an appeal from a denial of a motion to dismiss a complaint to enforce an equitable lien, said complaint filed in excess of one year after the last furnishing of labor, services or material. We reverse upon the authority of s 95.11(5)(b) (Fla.Stat.1975

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).