Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 6/24/2009

Roederer v. J. Garcia Carrion, S.A.

Citations

  • 569 F.3d 855
  • 91 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1214
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 13509
  • 2009 WL 1767549

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing the significance of the likelihood of confusion to a district court’s analysis of when a claim becomes “actionable and provable” for purposes of progressive encroachment
  • “[C]ourts tend to reject a defendant’s assertion of the laches defense when the defendant knew that the plaintiff objected to the use of the mark.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Melloy, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Roederer v. J. Garcia Carrion, S.A.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.