Roeder v. General Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “employment status was virtually unchanged” where plaintiff was “reassigned from the ‘courthouse beat’ to a ‘demeaning’ general reporting assignment” where the reassignment “would have involved no loss of pay or change in title”
• “The law does not permit an employee’s subjective perceptions to govern a claim of constructive discharge.”
• “there is no issue for trial unless there is sufficient evidence favoring the nonmoving party for a jury to return a verdict for that party”
• “there is no issue for trial unless there is sufficient evidence favoring the nonmoving party for a jury to return a verdict for that party”
• “there is no issue for trial unless there is sufficient evidence favoring the nonmoving party for a jury to return a verdict for that party”
• “there is no issue for trial unless there is sufficient evidence favoring the nonmoving party for a jury to return a verdict for that party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).