Roe v. Taylor

Citations

• 248 N.E.3d 886
• 2024 Ohio 2714

Syllabus

Summary judgment child pornography foreign judgment R.C. 2111.17 App.R. 12 App.R. 16. Appellant entered into an agreement with federal prosecutors to avoid prosecution for child pornography. The appellees, who were the minor victims and are now adults, obtained a judgment against appellant, who for years has tried to evade paying the judgment. Appellees brought a creditor's claim against appellant, identifying themselves using pseudonyms, as they had done in all prior litigation. The trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of appellees. Appellant's claim that the appellees are not allowed to file suit using pseudonyms has repeatedly been raised and found to be without merit in both state and federal court. His argument is once again wholly without merit. The court declines to review any assigned error that appellant raised but failed to argue separately in his brief.