Roe v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court could award restitution to state agencies on behalf of a child abuse victim where: (1) the financial loss was unexpected and occurred without the agencies' voluntary participation, and (2
• affirming restitution order in favor of county social services and state welfare departments since agencies were analogous “to a guardian acting on behalf of the children”
• considering state agency victim under restitution statute if harm or loss suffered was unexpected and occurred without voluntary participation of agency suffering harm or loss, and money expended for direct victims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Martinez v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1999-02-12· cited 24×
• Slaatte v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2013-04-18· cited 7×
• State v. Keehn
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-09-10· cited 6×
• State v. Hill
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1998-07-22· cited 6×
• WITTER (WILLIAM) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-DIRECT)
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2019-11-14· cited 3×
• Major v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2014-08-28
• Coleman (Krystal) Vs. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2019-12-19
• Cortez (Travess) Vs. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2020-09-30

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Igbinovia v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1995-05-25· cited 17×
• Botts v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1993-06-21· cited 12×
• Erickson v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1991-12-06· cited 11×