Roe v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In contrast to the situation confronted in Lane, the application of Title II to [applicants to a state bar], like Title I’s general prohibition of employment discrimination, does not enforce basic constitutional guarantees whose violation would trigger a higher standard of judicial review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).