Skip to main content
· 8/23/1973

Roe v. Ingraham

Citations

  • 364 F. Supp. 536
  • 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • permitting use of pseudonyms where plaintiffs challenged constitutionality of statute requiring disclosure of personal information to obtain prescription drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.