Skip to main content
· 2/13/2024

Roe v. Connolly, Hillyer & Ong

Citations

  • 236 N.E.3d 331
  • 2024 Ohio 553

Syllabus

Statute of Limitations

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the argument that plaintiff lacked standing when the regulation at issue had been applied to him previously and plaintiff demonstrated a likelihood that it would be applied to him again

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Delaney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.