Roe No. 1 v. Children's Hospital Medical Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “onerous burden” was factor in not imposing duty
• \there is little doubt that [defendant hospital] had a duty to supervise and monitor [third party's] conduct while he was employed as a physician\
• mentioning but not discussing the Third Restatement § 41
• mentioning but not discussing the Third Restatement§ 41
• mentioning but not discussing the Third Restatement§ 41

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).