Rodriquez v. United Fruit Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding privacy 15 ||concerns can ordinarily be addressed with a protective order
• overruling 18 objections against disclosure in part because “[t]he identities of the officers in question are 19 known, and the identity of anyone not a party to this case potentially disclosed in the document 20 can be withheld by a protective order”
• “Current case law suggests the privacy interests police officers have in their personnel files do not outweigh plaintiff’s interests in civil rights cases.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).