Skip to main content

Rodriquez v. State

Citations

  • 544 S.W.2d 382
  • 1976 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1005

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding defendant charged with assault on a police officer entitled to self-defense instruction and delineating facts admitted by defendant, including his knowledge that complainant was police officer
  • ‘Whether the officer used greater force than necessary, and whether appellant’s beliefs, fears and actions were reasonable as required by statute, were also fact issues for the jury....” (emphasis added)
  • “Appellant contends the trial court erred in refusing to charge the jury on self-defense after timely objection was made.”
  • “[W]hether appellant’s beliefs, fears and actions were reasonable as required by statute, were also fact issues for the jury, but the jury was also deprived of the opportunity to decide those issues…”
  • “[W]hether appellant’s beliefs, fears and actions were reasonable as required by statute, were also fact issues for the jury, but the jury was also deprived of the opportunity to decide those issues…”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Odom, Onion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.