Rodriques v. Santos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defense of laches requires a showing of “negligence to assert a known right, seasonably coupled with prejudice to an adverse party”
• holding that the defense of laches requires a showing of “negligence to assert a known right, seasonably coupled with prejudice to an adverse party”
• holding that the question of who is to be believed is one for the trier of fact
• holding that the question of who is to be believed is one for the trier of fact
• holding that the question of who is to be believed is one for the trier of fact
• stating that the question of who is to be believed is one for the trier of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).