Rodríguez-Vives v. Puerto Rico Firefighters Corps

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a similar constellation of actions was sufficient to permit a Title VII retaliation claim to survive a motion to dismiss
• holding that a complaint was not conclusory where it \described actions of - 52 - which [plaintiff] had personal knowledge in sufficient detail to make them plausible\
• “A conclusory allegation . . . is one which simply asserts a legal conclusion, such as ‘I was retaliated against,’ not a specific factual allegation . . . .”
• “A conclusory 22 allegation, however, is one which simply asserts a legal conclusion, such as ‘I was retaliated 23 against,’ not a specific factual allegation, such as ‘my supervisor threw a book at me,’ that merely 24 lacks some surrounding context.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).