Skip to main content
· 12/3/2003

Rodriguez v. Tombrink Enterprises, Inc.

Citations

  • 870 So. 2d 117
  • 2003 WL 22849453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the plaintiffs could not enforce the alleged oral agreement due to the existence of a final written contract containing a merger clause
  • affirming entry of summary judgment on breach of oral contract claim where subsequent written contract contained an integration clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.