District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/9/2013
Rodriguez v. State
Citations
- 120 So. 3d 656
- 2013 WL 4779613
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14420
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Absent a definitive pre-trial ruling, appellant was required to object to the admission of the child hearsay testimony at trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Rowe, Swanson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BrockmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-09-03· cited 16×
- Elwell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-25· cited 14×
- Tolbert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-10· cited 8×
- Wykle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-09-01· cited 7×
- McCloud v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-19· cited 6×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-01-06· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.