Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 12/1/1965
Rodriguez v. State
Citations
- 398 S.W.2d 124
- 1965 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he answer of the witness does not appear to be hearsay. The source of her knowledge was not shown.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Belcher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Boening v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1967-11-08· cited 40×
- Piraino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1967-05-24· cited 17×
- Austin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-03-04· cited 12×
- McDade v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1984-10-24· cited 4×
- Swartz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-10-26· cited 2×
- Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1982-01-14
- Jose Azael Zambrano-Perez v. the State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2023-12-12
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.