Rodriguez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the police lacked a reasonable, well-founded suspicion of criminal activity, where the actual source of the BOLO facts was unclear and the police observed no suspicious activity before the stop
• where an investigatory stop was invalid, in part, because the evidence failed to demonstrate whether the source of the BOLO received by the arresting officer was another police officer or, alternatively, some third party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Partlow v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-01-04· cited 12×
• Jean v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-23· cited 11×
• Jonavon D. Gaines v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-02-11· cited 11×
• Sanchez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-08-31· cited 7×
• Young v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-12· cited 6×
• Nettles v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-04· cited 3×
• H.L. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-16

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Moore
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-21· cited 21×
• Sumlin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-07-01· cited 20×
• Sapp v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-28· cited 14×
• Sanders v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-26· cited 6×
• Salem v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-21· cited 5×
• Stennes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-18· cited 4×