District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/12/2006
Rodriguez v. State
Citations
- 924 So. 2d 985
- 2006 WL 931749
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In carrying out an appellate mandate, the trial court’s role is purely ministerial. . . . It cannot deviate from the terms of an appellate mandate.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Larose
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Insko v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-14· cited 4×
- State v. GomezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-05-02· cited 4×
- VERONICA ELDER v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-04-26· cited 3×
- Haddad v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-18
- LARRY MARSHALL v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-10-18
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Houser v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-22· cited 106×
- CORPORATION v. Village of North Palm BeachSupreme Court of Florida· 1974-10-16· cited 33×
- Mendelson v. MendelsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-01-19· cited 21×
- Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-25· cited 20×
- Straley v. FrankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-28· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.