Rodriguez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing the conviction of a man charged with operating a vessel while intoxicated because the jury was instructed that he could be found guilty whether he was intoxicated or simply under the influence, the statute proscribing either
• “ Tf a statute makes it punishable to do a particular thing specified, ‘or’ another thing, ‘or’ another, one commits the offense who does any one of the things, or any two, or more, or all of them.’”
• “ ‘If a statute makes it punishable to do a particular thing specified, “or” another thing, “or” another, one commits the offense who does any one of the things, or any two, or more, or all of them.’ ” (quoting Edwards v. State, 62 Fla. 40, 56 So. 401, 403 (1911))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brown
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-05· cited 10×
• Atwell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-19· cited 8×
• City of Miami Beach v. Kuoni Destination Management, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-08· cited 7×
• Reinstein v. Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition of Florida, P.A.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-11· cited 1×
• Johns v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-28

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ingram v. Pettit
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1976-12-09· cited 53×
• Long v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1957-01-23· cited 42×
• Roberts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-10-24· cited 13×