Rodriguez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a sexual assault nurse examiner was qualified to testify the child victim’s injuries were consistent with digital penetration
• holding a SANE was qualified to testify the child victim’s injuries were consistent with digital penetration
• upholding trial court’s decision to allow into evidence nurse’s opinion that the victim’s injuries were consistent with ones caused by penetration by a finger based on her education and SANE training

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Freed v. Geisinger Medical Center
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-06-15· cited 39×
• Young v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2012-10-25· cited 25×
• Commonwealth v. Jennings
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-09-29· cited 16×
• Ottley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-11-20· cited 7×
• Blash v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-06-22
• Lester Owensby Pauley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-05-04
• Winfred Ottley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-11-20

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Duvall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-05-02· cited 34×
• Hyde v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-11-30· cited 22×
• Rudisail v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-01-26· cited 12×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-11-14· cited 11×