Skip to main content
· 3/14/2008

Rodriguez v. Smithfield Packing Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 545 F. Supp. 2d 508
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29597
  • 2008 WL 1000471

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that no relief is available if the “violation caused no harm”
  • stating that no relief is available if the “violation caused no harm”
  • explaining that although an employee does not need to explicitly state that she seeks to take FMLA leave, mere notice that the employee is sick without details about the nature of the illness is insufficient to indicate to the employer that FMLA leave is necessary
  • “An employee must give[] some level of detail regarding the nature of the illness and the likely duration of the absence.”
  • employee must provide “some level of detail regarding the nature of the illness and the likely duration of the absence such that the employer is able to reasonably conclude that the absence may qualify as FMLA leave”
  • “[A]n employee must give[ ] some level of detail regarding the nature of the illness and the likely duration of the absence such that the employer is able to reasonably conclude that the absence may qualify as FMLA leave.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roger W. Titus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.