Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 8/31/1998
Rodriguez v. Printone Color Corp.
Citations
- 982 S.W.2d 69
- 1998 WL 209209
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that venue was proper where evidence indicated that cause of action accrued in county of temporary residence due to employment
- concluding that venue was proper where evidence indicated that cause of action accrued in county of temporary residence due to employment
- considering a specific denial found in a supplemental motion to transfer
- considering a specific denial found in a supplemental motion to transfer
- \[S]tatements such as 'Defendant specifically denies those venue facts pleaded in Plaintiff's Petition' do not constitute a 'specific denial' as required by Tex. R. Civ. P. 87.\
- “[S]tatements such as ‘Defendant specifically denies those venue facts pleaded in Plaintiff’s Petition’ do not constitute a ‘specific denial’ as required by TEX . R. CIV. P. 87.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schneider, Andell, Taft
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- the Better Business Bureau of Metropolitan Houston, Inc. v. John Moore Services, Inc. and John Moore Renovation, LLCTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2013-07-16· cited 176×
- Newspaper Holdings, Inc. v. Crazy Hotel Assisted Living, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2013-10-24· cited 119×
- Schimmel v. McGregorCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2014-07-10· cited 95×
- KTRK Television, Inc. v. Theaola RobinsonTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2013-07-11· cited 74×
- Antonov v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-06-30· cited 66×
- Jesus Miranda v. Stephen BylesTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2012-10-25· cited 39×
- Shamoun & Norman, LLP v. Yarto International Group, LPTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2012-05-31· cited 38×
- Mikey's Houses LLC v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2007-05-03· cited 24×
- Mustang Athletic Corp. v. MonroeTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2004-05-13· cited 21×
- Garcia v. GarzaTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-02-28· cited 12×
- Lynn Smith Chevrolet-GEO, Inc. v. TidwellCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-03-24· cited 8×
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-06-30
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-06-30
- Lynn Smith Chevrolet-Geo, Inc. AND Jason E. Tidwell and Lorene Butler v. Jason E. Tidwell and Lorene Butler AND Lynn Smith Chevrolet-Geo, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-03-24
- Mirtha Garza, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Isidro Reyes, III v. State and County Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2007-04-19
- Mustang Athletic Corp. Individually and D/B/A Mustang Sports and/or Mustang Athletic Club v. Karen Monroe, Individually and A/N/F of Cameron MonroeTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2004-05-13
- Ines Gonzalez Garcia v. Ramiro Garza, and J & R Valley Oilfield Services, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-02-28
- Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. v. Superior Payphones, Ltd.Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-02-23
- Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas and John Burpo v. Mike SheffieldTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2014-01-31
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2014-07-10
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ruiz v. Conoco, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1994-02-09· cited 327×
- Wilson v. Texas Parks & Wildlife DepartmentTexas Supreme Court· 1994-12-08· cited 274×
- Maranatha Temple, Inc. v. Enterprise Products Co.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1992-07-16· cited 86×
- Grounds v. Tolar Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court· 1993-06-23· cited 75×
- Schwartz v. Pinnacle CommunicationsTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1997-03-27· cited 71×
- Rosales v. H.E. Butt Grocery Co.Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1995-08-23· cited 63×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.