Rodriguez v. Moss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that retirees are entitled to settle a claim against the company arising under a CBA even when the retirees’ former union has a suit pending on the same issue
• explaining that courts must construe CBA provisions \so as to render none nugatory and avoid illusory promises\
• explaining that courts must construe CBA provisions “so as to render none nugatory and avoid illusory promises”
• noting that a “collective bargaining agreement should [not] be construed to affirmatively promote any particular policy”
• explaining that courts must construe CBA provisions “so as to render none nugatory and avoid illusory promises”
• explaining that if retiree benefits expired at the end of the CBA then the promise to provide certain benefits at age sixty-five \is completely illusory for many early retirees under age 62\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).