· 5/20/1889
Rodriguez v. Lambert
Citations
- 79 Cal. 187
- 21 P. 731
- 1889 Cal. LEXIS 694
Syllabus
<p>Abpeal—Heview of Evidence — Substantial Conflict.—When there is a substantial conflict of evidence upon the points in respect to which the findings are assailed as not justified by the evidence, the findings will not be disturbed by the appellate court.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming trial court’s order of mistrial as “manifest necessity” where excluded exhibit was inadvertently taken into the jury room
- no double-jeopardy bar where mistrial declared based on inadvertent transmission of inadmissible evidence to jury
- no double jeopardy bar where mistrial declared based on inadvertent transmission of inadmissible evidence to jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Belcher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.