Tenth Circuit· 3/14/2001
Rodriguez v. IBP, Inc.
Citations
- 243 F.3d 1221
- 49 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 122
- 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1341
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 3904
- 2001 WL 252734
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the imposed sanction served “to protect the truth-seeking procedures of discovery, and the [non-complying party] himself eschewed all opportunities to avoid the sanction”
- expressing the concern that “a post-trial discovery order would never be appealable until a party complies”
- “This court will not make arguments for Rodriguez that he did not make himself.”
- “This court will not make arguments for [appellant] that he did not make himself.”
- “Rodriguez's attempt to characterize the district court's order as a reopening of discovery belies the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rodriguez had a continuing duty to disclose information […] even after discovery closed.”
- “In determining whether to treat the motion as a notice of appeal, we examine whether the moving party intended to seek appellate review and whether it provided sufficient notice to the parties and courts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henry, Murphy, Mills
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- A. Farber & Partners Inc. v. GarberC.D. California· 2006-02-15· cited 62×
- Acosta v. Paragon Contractors Corp.Tenth Circuit· 2018-03-13· cited 44×
- Sanjuan v. IBP, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2002-01-11· cited 39×
- Griffith v. El Paso County, ColoradoTenth Circuit· 2025-02-19· cited 32×
- Reed v. Landstar Ligon, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2002-12-11· cited 28×
- Sprint Communications Company L.P., v. Vonage Holdings Corp.D. Kansas· 2007-08-07· cited 28×
- Cobell v. NortonDistrict of Columbia· 2002-09-17· cited 23×
- In re:Contempt Order v.Tenth Circuit· 2006-03-31· cited 11×
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District of Columbia· 2017-09-13· cited 9×
- United States v. LibrettiTenth Circuit· 2001-10-03· cited 5×
- Mundo-Rios v. Vizcarrondo-IrizarryD. Puerto Rico· 2002-10-24· cited 4×
- United States v. Hernandez (Velasco)Tenth Circuit· 2014-11-14· cited 1×
- Perez v. Paragon Contractors Corp.D. Utah· 2016-12-06· cited 1×
- Deborah Doherty and Sandra Luedtke, as agent and attorney-in-fact for Deborah Doherty v. Purdue Properties I, LLC Campus Apartments Management, LLC Corridor, LLC (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-06-29
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc.First Circuit· 1988-09-28· cited 251×
- Phillips v. CalhounTenth Circuit· 1992-02-11· cited 149×
- Consumers Gas & Oil, Inc. v. Farmland Industries, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1996-05-17· cited 71×
- June T. Perry v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyEleventh Circuit· 1984-06-22· cited 69×
- United States v. SmithTenth Circuit· 1999-06-28· cited 61×
- Federal Trade Commission v. Alaska Land Leasing, Inc., Linda Kane, Non-Party Deponent-AppellantTenth Circuit· 1985-12-02· cited 46×
- Twylah Sue Hooker v. Continental Life Insurance Company, a Texas CorporationTenth Circuit· 1992-05-28· cited 27×
- Edward L. Martinez, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Schock Transfer and Warehouse Company, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantTenth Circuit· 1986-05-02· cited 24×
- Gwn Petroleum Corp. v. Ok-Tex Oil & Gas, Inc.First Circuit· 1993-07-09· cited 14×
- United States v. Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization, Local 504, Doug Ramsay and Steve HeltonTenth Circuit· 1983-03-21· cited 10×
- United States ex rel. Woodward v. TynanTenth Circuit· 1985-10-30· cited 5×
- Pascual R. Rodriguez v. Ibp, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1998-07-20· cited 4×
Other cases named Rodriguez v. IBP, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.