Skip to main content
· 7/17/2002

Rodriguez v. Hahn

Citations

  • 209 F. Supp. 2d 344
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13143
  • 2002 WL 1592522

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, under the summary judgment standard, “a pro se party’s bald assertions unsupported by evidence, are insufficient to overcome” substantiated claims by the moving party
  • “Proceeding pro se does not otherwise relieve a litigant of the usual requirements of summary judgment, and a pro se party’s bald assertions unsupported by evidence, are insufficient to overcome a motion for summary judgment.”
  • “a pro se party’s bald assertions unsupported by evidence, are insufficient to overcome a motion for summary judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marrero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.