Rodriguez v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that federal common law exists in “admiralty disputes and certain controversies between States”
• “As this Court has put it, there is ‘no federal general common law.’” (quoting Erie, 304 U.S. at 78)
• “In contexts 10 like [admiralty disputes and certain controversies between states], federal common 11 law often plays an important role.”
• “In the absence of congressional authorization, common lawmaking must be ‘necessary to protect uniquely federal interests.’ ”
• “[O]nly limited areas exist in which federal judges may appropriately craft the rule of decision.”
• “Because [the company at issue] is incorporated in Delaware we apply Delaware law to the questions presented to us.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Rodriguez v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Rodriguez v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.
  Supreme Court· 2019-06-28