Rodriguez v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing the plaintiff’s section 1983 equal protection claim because she did not allege any facts suggesting that “the individual defendants took action against her because of, not merely in spite of, her membership in a protected class”
• “There are 26 no factual allegations in the second amended complaint that connect plaintiff's race, national origin, or disability to the adverse employment decisions of which she complains.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).