Rodriguez v. Debuono

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether private right of action can be implied from federal statute is itself sufficient federal question to meet modest requirements for subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331
• explaining that an 6 injury must be “neither remote nor speculative, but actual and imminent” to constitute irreparable harm (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[T]he moving party must first demonstrate that such [irreparable] injury is likely before the other requirements for the issuance of an injunction will be considered.”
• “The movant must demonstrate an injury that is neither remote nor speculative, but actual and imminent and that cannot be remedied by an award of monetary damages.” (internal marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).