Skip to main content
· 1/10/2006

Rodriguez v. Conagra Grocery Prod

Citations

  • 436 F.3d 468
  • 2006 WL 45857

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that employer’s admission that it withdrew plaintiff’s job offer because of its perception that he suffers from uncontrolled diabetes was direct evidence of disability discrimination
  • following the lead of Texas courts in relying on analogous federal law to interpret the TCHRA
  • “Given the similarity between the ADA and the TCHRA, Texas courts look to analogous federal precedent for guidance when interpreting the Texas Act.”
  • “Given the similarity between the ADA and the TCHRA, Texas courts ‘look to analogous federal precedent for guidance when interpreting the Texas Act.’” (quoting NME Hosps., Inc. v. Rennels, 994 S.W.2d 142, 144 (Tex.1999)
  • analyzing ADA and TCHRA disability-discrimination claims together under federal law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.