Rodriguez v. Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• awarding attorney’s fees for work done before the federal court even though the case was remanded on consent
• “Fee awards may be made under both the EAJA and §406(b), but the claimant’s attorney must refund to the claimant the amount of the smaller fee.”
• “Fee awards may be made under both the EAJA and § 406(b), but the claimant’s attorney must refund to the claimant the amount of the smaller fee.” (cleaned up)
• “[A] reduction in the agreed- upon contingency amount should not be made lightly, particularly given the importance of encouraging attorneys to accept social security cases on a contingency basis.”
• “[A] reduction in the agreed-upon contingency amount should not be made lightly, . . . particularly given the importance of encouraging attorneys to accept social security cases on a contingency basis.”
• “Fee awards may be made under both the EAJA and [section] 406(b), but the claimant’s attorney must refund to the claimant the amount of the smaller fee.” (quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gisbrecht v. Barnhart
  Supreme Court· 2002-05-28· cited 4,551×
• Joslyn v. Barnhart
  W.D. New York· 2005-10-04· cited 171×
• Blizzard v. Astrue
  S.D. New York· 2007-07-20· cited 103×