Rodriguez v. Chater

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “some intentional misconduct is required to justify the sanction of a negative inference”
• observing that the court was “not required to enforce the ‘horse trade’” between the parties that was not memorialized by a signed and filed stipulation
• declining to enforce an agreement between the parties that ran contrary to court’s order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).