Rodriguez-Rios v. Cordero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that generally, motivation is a question of fact for the jury
• finding evidence sufficient when demonstrated defendants were politically active and were aware of plaintiffs opposing views
• evidence demonstrating that defendants were politically active and were aware of plaintiffs opposing views
• “Where the elements of a sufficient prima facie case combine with the factfinder's belief .that the ostensible basis for [demoting an] employee was pretextual, ... the factfinder is permitted to infer ... intentional [political] discrimination ....”
• evidence demonstrating that defendants were politically active and were aware of plaintiffs opposing views

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).