Rodriguez, Pete

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that ‘‘incarceration nonetheless may prove an obstacle to reunification due to the parent’s unavailability’’ (inter- nal quotation marks omitted)
• new trial was not warranted where error regarding factual finding appeared harmless to determination taken as whole
• after close of evidence assistant attorney general informed court it omitted canvass of respondent; court asked parties to return to court and canvassed respondent prior to issuing its decision
• failure to rehabilitate pursuant to § 17a-112 [j][3][B][i]
• respondent canvassed after evidence concluded but before judgment rendered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).