Rodriguez Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. Feinstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that certiorari review is proper when an order implicates a violation of the parties’ constitutional rights and the harm cannot be corrected on plenary appeal
• noting “the absence of any time or scope limitations on the prohibited extra-judicial communications”
• reversing a gag order because it was not supported by evidence
• “At the hearing, counsel for the petitioners offered to the court that no further advertisements would run and that petitioners would limit any future media communications .... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).