Rodriguez-Cuervos v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the defendant’s possible failure to follow its standard operating procedure was insufficient evidence of discrimination
• noting that, where positive past performance evaluations are based on work completed “in different capacities . . ., under different supervisors,” they do not support a finding of pretext
• finding two employees not similarly situated where the employees had different supervisors and worked under different circumstances
• treating fact that employer's \evaluation process may not have treated [plaintiff] fairly\ as insufficient evidence that \evaluation was a pretext for unlawful discrimination\
• defining cross-elasticity of 11 demand as an economic measure indicating whether “consumers would respond to a slight increase in the price of one product by switching to another product”
• “a claim of disparate treatment must rest on proof that the proposed analogue is similarly situated in all material respects”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).