Rodriguez Colon, Manuel Angel v. Rodriguez Colon, Wilfrido

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that telephone users had no subjective expectations of privacy in dialed telephone numbers and any such expectation was not one society was prepared to recognize
• holding that “[w]hen [defendant] used his phone, [he] voluntarily conveyed numerical information to the telephone company and ‘exposed’ that information to its equipment in the ordinary course of business”
• holding that the individual’s expectation of privacy triggering Fourth Amendment protections must be “one that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable”
• holding that telephone users had no subjective expectations of privacy in dialed telephone numbers and any such expectation was not one society was prepared to recognize
• holding that using a pen register on a phone did not violate the Fourth Amendment because a phone user has no reasonable expectation of privacy in the information provided to a third party by his voluntary use of a phone
• holding no objectively reasonable expectation of privacy in numbers dialed on the telephone

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).