Rodrigues v. Members Mortgage Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the practice of requiring borrower to certify at closing the three-day period had expired and the transaction had not been rescinded \has the serious potential for actual harm.\
• granting motion to dismiss plaintiff’s TILA claims that were not filed within one year of the date of the alleged violation
• dismissing plaintiffs’ claim under the Massachusetts Consumer Credit Cost Disclosure Act
• essentially identical disclosure requirements of the CCCDA and TILA “do not require separate analysis”
• discussing Massachusetts statute and federal exemption
• denying lender’s motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).